منابع مشابه
Noun Incorporation in Frisian
Noun incorporation in Frisian (Dyk 1997) is unusual because it shows certain restrictions that are not seen in other languages with noun incorporation, such as Mohawk and Chukchi. In addition, while others argue that noun incorporation is indeed possible in Germanic (see Booij 2009 for Dutch, Barrie and Spreng 2009 for German), Frisian is unusual even with respect to Germanic in allowing noun i...
متن کاملThe Evolution of Noun Incorporation
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملTongan Noun Incorporation: Words and Phrases
Analyses of Tongan noun incorporation in the general typological surveys of noun incorporation (Mithun 1984, Gerdts 1998) have argued that this Tongan construction involves syntactic juxtaposition of a verb and a single noun. Given data as such in (1), this would seem to be correct, since ordinary transitive sentences like (1a) contrast with sentences with incorporation, like (1b), in that the ...
متن کاملNoun Incorporation and Non-canonical Objects
Noun incorporation in Northern Iroquoian and non-canonical objects in Chinese share many traits. We argue that this is not an accident, but that it is due to Case and theta licensing principles. We show that this has larger implications for the theory of Case and argument licensing in general. We assume, without discussion, that NI is syntactic(see also Barrie). The syntactic nature of NI is un...
متن کاملNoun incorporation and the Mohawk lexicon
Mohawk, like many North American languages, seems to do in its morphology what more familiar languages do in their syntax. When faced with such a language, the linguist is forced to reconsider some basic notions. Do we ignore the apparent parallels between syntactic and morphological processes and continue to treat them diierently, or do we push syntax down below the word level? What is the div...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics
سال: 1982
ISSN: 1043-3805
DOI: 10.17161/kwpl.1808.3616